Trial of cheque bounce case

t

Question asked on: 21/09/2015

I like to file a check bounce case in fast track court.

a. Is there any specific procedure for applying a case in fast track court?

b. Will I get a quick judgement than the normal court?( I have heard check bounce cases pending for 3 years in normal court)

c. is it possible to convert cases from normal court to fast track court?

Advised by: Shivendra Pratap Singh,

Cheque bounce case is registered on complaint. The court of first class judicial magistrate has jurisdiction to try these cases. Fast track courts are constituted by the court of sessions. There is no provision in law to try offences under section 138 NI Act i.e. cheque bounce case, before fast track court.

Usually the time prescribed by the Act for fast disposal in Section 138 matters is 6 months (S. 143 N.I. Act, 1881) but unfortunately the matters are not disposed within the said time frame as the courts are flooded with matters. Some states like Delhi, there is some special courts are constituted for fast disposal of cases registered under section 138  NI Act. The minimum time period for a trial to end in a cheque bounce case is 2-3 years.

In J.V. BAHARUNI & ANR. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT & Others AIR 2014 the Supreme court of India has given some guidelines towards cheque bounce case as:

  • All the subordinate Courts must make an endeavour to expedite the hearing of cases in a time bound manner which in turn will restore the confidence of the common man in the justice delivery system. When law expects something to be done within prescribed time limit, some efforts are required to be made to obey the mandate of law.
  • The learned Magistrate has the discretion under Section 143 of the N.I. Act either to follow a summary trial or summons trial. In case the Magistrate wants to conduct a summons trial, he should record the reasons after hearing the parties and proceed with the trial in the manner provided under the second proviso to Section 143 of the N.I. Act. Such reasons should necessarily  be recorded by the Trial Court so that further litigation arraigning the mode of trial can be avoided.
  • The learned Judicial Magistrate should make all possible attempts to encourage compounding of offence at an early stage of litigation. In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the compensatory aspect of remedy must be given priority over the punitive aspect.
  • Remitting the matter for de novo trial should be exercised as a last resort and should be used sparingly when there is grave miscarriage of justice in the light of illegality, irregularity, incompetence or any other defect which cannot be cured at an appellate stage. The appellate Court should be very cautious and exercise the discretion judiciously while remanding the matter for de novo trial.

Some endeavors have been taken by the apex court for fast disposal of offences punishable under NI Act. But no provision is made towards trial of these offences by the fast track courts.

Ask Your Question

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate, Lucknow

Advice: 17493

Consultation: 3402

Section 142 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

I am a software engineer and working in Infosys. One of my colleagues met financial hardship and requested from me to give five lakh rupees. I remitted that amount in his bank account. I have evidence to prove that he took an unsecured loan from me. After seven months...

A company committed offence under section 138 N I Act

Whether a company is liable for the offence of cheque dishonour under section 138 of NI Act? When a company issued a cheque and it is dishonoured by the drawee bank it is said that offence under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act, is committed by the...

Dishonour of security cheque commits no offence under section 138 NI Act

I have taken a loan from bajaj finseve. I gave three cheques for security purpose. I paid 18 EMI on time. From last few months, I was not able to pay EMI. They filed the cheque and deposited to the bank, which dishonoured due to insufficient balance. Moreover, they...

When can I file complaint in cheque bounce case

When can I file complaint for the offence of dishonour of cheque? Dishonouring of cheque for insufficiency of fund in the account is generally called bounce of cheque. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 envisages bounce of cheque is an offence and also...

section 138 of the negotiable instrument act 1881

My friend issued a cheque for discharge of his liability but it is dishonoured due to insufficient fund. I want to know that when it can be said that offence under section 138 has committed.  Dishonour of cheque is an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

quick Advice

Get A Quick Advice

Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes

Talk to Advocate Shivendra

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes and get solid advice on the phone

Book it Now