Home | Legal Advice | Divorce Cases | Separation by agreement

Separation by agreement

Question: Can we live separate by our agreement instead of a decree of judicial separation? Parties to the marriage want to live separate without filing a petition of judicial separation or divorce they can do so by an agreement called separation by agreement. Parties are not under a legal obligation to perform any marital duties during the subsistence of this agreement.
Question in: Divorce Cases
advocate shivendra

Shivendra Singh

Advocate

High Court Lucknow

Reading Time:

However Hindu Marriage Act (from now on said the Act) is silent towards this agreement but Act also does not make it void, so this agreement is valid between the parties. This agreement does not amount to divorce, but it suspends all the marital obligation between husband and wife until it is not revoked by the parties.

This type of agreement was recognized in Hindu law before this Act. It was generally called “chhutti-chhutta,” and it was widely prevalent among lower caste. It continues to be so even now. This is a swift and peaceful procedure to live separate and to avoid the constitution of a ground of divorce, i.e., desertion. Parties to the agreement cannot be called deserted by others.

Generally, parties make some arrangements towards the amount of maintenance, custody of children, prevent another party to file any petition, etc. However, this agreement cannot abridge or takes away any right which is provided by law. Parties to the agreement can file a petition for maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.C. or section 25 of the Act. Section 18(2) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 is also applicable to them regarding maintenance for wife living separately from the husband.

When conditions of the parties became changed after the agreement, and such condition requires enforcing other legal rights, then the party can enforce it notwithstanding that it is prevented by the agreement. In Thakur vs. Dharma, it is held by the Allahabad High Court that court can interfere in the matter which is prevented by the agreement if the condition of the parties justifies such inference of the court.

Recent Advise

I constructed my house on the written permission of NHAI : How to protect its demolition?

As per Karnataka state government laws building to be constructed 40 metre away from the centre line of national highway’s road. When we approached the NHAI, engineer provided conditional approval about building construction. He took written statements saying that the owner will not receive compensation for demolition of his building if the NHAI would demolish his building during road widening. We started building construction after getting approval from NHAI. Now the Karnataka high court bench has upheld the government’s law about 40 metre. The court has directed the authority to take action. Could you please guide how we can proceed now.

An agreement to sale holder has dispossessed me forcefully

I bought the immovable property through a registered sale deed. Before purchasing the immovable property the seller made an unregistered sale agreement with another one and gave him the possession of the property. But later on the person who made a sale agreement did not act as per sale agreement. So the original owner of the property sent him a notice for cancellation of the sale agreement. After that I purchased the said property through the registered sale deed and I took possession of the said property. Now that unregistered sale agreement holder files a suit under specific performance and forcefully took the possession of said property. Now matter is pending in court so my question is whether I can lodge the FIR against the unregistered sale agreement person for trespass offence?

Kanoonirai established in 2014. It provides a facility to consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54