Right to irrigation of agricultural land

t

Question asked on: 19/11/2015

I was bataidar of the agricultural land of Solan, Himachal Pradesh. I had been bataidar from 1967 to 1977 and there after I purchased that land from the owner. There is a common well for irrigation of land. When I was bataidar I used that well for irrigation but when I became owner of the land my previous landlord objected to use that well. He filed a civil suit for the injunction order for stopping me to use that well.

I have right to irrigation of agricultural land because due to irrigation i have paid more money otherwise land would be sold on less price. His suit is dismissed by the court of junior and  senior division. Now he filed appeal before the high court. Section 36 of the H.P. Tenancy and land reform act gives such right to me.

Advised by: Shivendra Pratap Singh,

According to section 36 of the Himachal Pradesh tenancy and land reform act tenant has right to use all the facilities available before commencement of the act. This act came in force in year 1972 and your tenancy had been in existence from year 1967.

When you had right irrigate your land from that common well then landlord has no right to curtail or terminate use of well water enjoyed by tenant immediately before commencement of this act. Sub section 3 of section 104 of the Himachal Pradesh tenancy and land reform act also protect your right. According to this section you have all the rights, title and interest in respect of the land which was enjoyed by the landowner immediately before sell or transfer of land.

This common well has been used by the landowners for irrigation of their lands. So you have accrued that interest and right by the taking ownership of that land. All the incidental and contingent rights of the property are transfer to purchaser at the time of sell or transfer of property, so you got the right to irrigation of agricultural land from the land owner.

You should not be afraid from the High Court because it is court of record and not need to re appreciation of evidence in deciding right of the parties.

Ask Your Question

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate, Lucknow

Advice: 17493

Consultation: 3402

Consumer forum case is dismissed in default

I have filed a case before the consumer forum but due to nonappearance in the hearing my case is dismissed by the forum. Can I file another case before the consumer forum or file an appeal before the state consumer forum.  Your case is dismissed for default....

Forfeiture of gratuity without held guilty

I am a retired government servant. A departmental proceeding was pending at the time of my retirement. Therefore, the competent authority had forfeited my gratuity without holding me guilty of proved misconduct. He presented ambiguous inquiry report which is...

Protected: Lawyers can practice in any court

Password Protected

To view this protected post, enter the password below:

Right to irrigation of agricultural land

I was bataidar of the agricultural land of Solan, Himachal Pradesh. I had been bataidar from 1967 to 1977 and there after I purchased that land from the owner. There is a common well for irrigation of land. When I was bataidar I used that well for irrigation but when...

Charging higher rate than other

Motor vehicle goods counter is charging higher rare than other. A is running a light motor vehicle goods counter. He/she is charging carrying charges higher than nominal compare to other counter. Shall I lodge FIR against A and under what provision he/she shall be...

quick Advice

Get A Quick Advice

Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes

Talk to Advocate Shivendra

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes and get solid advice on the phone

Book it Now