Home | Legal Advice | Criminal Law | Prosecution after retirement

Prosecution after retirement

Question: Can a department prosecute to its employees after retirement for his Negligence to fulfil his duties?
Question in: Criminal Law
advocate shivendra

Shivendra Singh

Advocate

High Court Lucknow

Reading Time:

You did not mention details about your employment and the year of retirement. Generally, every civil service rule has a limitation period for prosecution of the retired employee. If there is a delay of more than four years, you are entitled to prefer a petition before the appropriate Court or Tribunal for quashing of the preceding. The Supreme Court has stated in several judgements that the launch of prosecution after an inordinate delay is unlawful.

According to article 21 of the Constitution of India, every person has the right to get speedy justice. The prosecution is illegal if the government keeps the investigation pending or sanctions the inquiry after a long time of retirement. Generally, the court does quash the proceeding if it is launched after more then four years.

In State of Punjab v. Kailash Nath, (1989) 1 SCC 321 the supreme court held that departmental enquiry after four years of retirement is pervasive and liable to be quashed. If the employee is guilty of any offence punishable under the Indian penal code or the prevention of corruption act, then the above said limitation period would not apply.

Hence, if no criminal liability arising from the act committed during the service, then and the department cannot prosecute the employee. If that act constitutes criminal liability, then the department and the government have the liberty to prosecute. However, it is not clear whether any criminal liability accrued out of that negligence.

If not, then the prosecution is unlawful and you have the right to challenge it before proper forum. You can file a petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal if you are a Central Government employee. However, you can also move a petition before the high court under article 226 of the constitution of India.

Recent Advise

I constructed my house on the written permission of NHAI : How to protect its demolition?

As per Karnataka state government laws building to be constructed 40 metre away from the centre line of national highway’s road. When we approached the NHAI, engineer provided conditional approval about building construction. He took written statements saying that the owner will not receive compensation for demolition of his building if the NHAI would demolish his building during road widening. We started building construction after getting approval from NHAI. Now the Karnataka high court bench has upheld the government’s law about 40 metre. The court has directed the authority to take action. Could you please guide how we can proceed now.

An agreement to sale holder has dispossessed me forcefully

I bought the immovable property through a registered sale deed. Before purchasing the immovable property the seller made an unregistered sale agreement with another one and gave him the possession of the property. But later on the person who made a sale agreement did not act as per sale agreement. So the original owner of the property sent him a notice for cancellation of the sale agreement. After that I purchased the said property through the registered sale deed and I took possession of the said property. Now that unregistered sale agreement holder files a suit under specific performance and forcefully took the possession of said property. Now matter is pending in court so my question is whether I can lodge the FIR against the unregistered sale agreement person for trespass offence?

Kanoonirai established in 2014. It provides a facility to consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54