Presumption of paternity of child

Question asked on: 17/11/2014

How to presume paternity of child? Is there any law regarding the presumption of paternity of child in devoid of any direct evidence?

Advised by: Shivendra Pratap Singh,

The basic principle of law, which is laid down in sec section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, that if a person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage  between his mother and any man or within two hundred  and eighty days after its dissolution and  the  mother remains unmarried,  it shall be taken as  conclusive  proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can  be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other  at  any time when he could have been  begotten.

Sec 112. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy.—The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten.

The rule, contained in the above Section, that continuance of a valid marriage will prevent an inference being drawn to the effect that the children born to a woman during the continuance of the valid marriage were born to another person as a result of adulterous intercourse is only a rule of evidence.

Presumption of paternity

The presumption which Section 112, Evidence Act, 1872, contemplates, is a conclusive presumption of law regarding paternity which can be displaced only by proof of the particular fact mentioned in the Section, namely, non-access between the parties to the marriage at a time when according to the ordinary course of nature, the husband could have been the father of the child.

It is the principle of law about presumption of paternity that “Odiosa et inkonesta non sunt in lege prae sumenda” (Nothing odious or dishonourable will be presumed by the law). So the law presumes against vice and immorality.

Case law

In Goutam Kundu vs. State of West Bengal and another, Supreme Court held about paternity test ( DNA test)

  • That Courts in India cannot order blood test as a matter of course.
  • Wherever applications are made for such prayers in order to have roving inquiry, the prayer for blood test cannot be entertained.
  • There must be a strong prima facie case in that the husband must establish non-access in order to dispel the presumption arising under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.
  • The Court must carefully examine as to what would be the consequence of ordering the blood test, whether it will have the effect of branding a child as a bastard and the mother as an unchaste woman.
  • No one can be compelled to give samle of blood for analysis.

We may remember that Section 112 of the Evidence Act was enacted at a time when the modern scientific advancements with Dioxy Nucleric Acid (DNA) as well as Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) tests were not even in contemplation of the legislature.

The result of a genuine DNA test is said to be scientifically accurate. But even that is not enough to escape from the conclusiveness of Section 112 of the Act, e.g., if a husband and wife were living together during the time of conception but the DNA test revealed that the child was not born to the husband, the conclusiveness in law would remain unrebuttable.

Sham Lal @ Kuldeep vs. Sanjeev Kumar and others, (2009) :- Once the validity of marriage is proved then there is strong presumption about the legitimacy of children born from that wedlock. The presumption of paternity can only be rebutted by a strong, clear, satisfying and conclusive evidence.

Bhabani Prasad Jena vs. Convenor Secretary, Orissa State Commission for Women and another, (2010) Supreme court expressed his view on DNA test that ” In a matter where presumption of paternity of a child is in issue before the court, the use of DNA test is an extremely delicate and sensitive aspect. One view is that when modern science gives the means of ascertaining the paternity of a child, there should not be any hesitation to use those means whenever the occasion requires. The other view is that the court must be reluctant in the use of such scientific advances and tools which result in invasion of right to privacy of an individual and may not only be prejudicial to the rights of the parties but may have devastating effect on the child. Sometimes the result of such scientific test may bastardise an innocent child even though his mother and her spouse were living together during the time of conception.”

Conclusion

It was permissible for a Court to permit the holding of a DNA test, if it was eminently needed, after balancing the interests of the parties. Section 112 of the Evidence Act does not create a legal fiction but provides for presumption and this presumption is in favour of paternity. But court may order to conduct DNA test to determine the veracity of the allegations, which constitute one of the grounds, on which the concerned party would either succeed or lose.

Send your question

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate, Lucknow

Advice: 16865

Consultation: 3329

Relief in domestic violence case

My wife has filed a false case under the domestic violence act. She made me all family members as accused. However, no specific allegation was made against my family members, but she made a specific accusation against me. She asserted that I had abandoned her after...

My brother-in-law’s wife is frequently threatening my mothers in-law: What should I do?

Question: My brother-in-law's wife is frequently threatening my mothers in-law that she would make a complaint to the police that she (my mother in law ) is harassing her (my brother in law's wife) and threaten to put her behind the bar. My mother in law's age is 72,...

When can I file complaint in cheque bounce case

When can I file a complaint about the offence of dishonour of cheque? Dishonouring of a cheque for insufficiency of the fund in the account is generally called bounce of cheque. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 envisages bounce of cheque is an offence...

How to file FIR in criminal breach of trust

You should approach the nearest police station to lodge an FIR for the offence of criminal breach of trust. If the offence has been committed in his territorial jurisdiction then the police will commence investigation otherwise he shall lodge a zero FIR and send it to the competent police station.

Illegal custody for breach of peace

Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the police officer to arrest a person on the suspicion of commencement of cognisable offence. If there is no reasonable ground for suspicion but police has arrested a person under section 151, such an arrest is illegal and state government shall compensate the arrested person.

Can I file a case under Section 340 crpc for filing a false affidavit?

Question: Can I file a case under Section 340 crpc for filing a false affidavit? As per affidavit in domestic violence case on 8/9/2017 ,my wife stated that my mother lodged a fake case of blackmailing and extortion in PS on 6,7,2016. but no such case was registered...

What happens if a driver is not holding a valid driving licence at the time of accident?

Question: Sir, What happens if a driver is not holding a valid driving licence at the time of accident? If the complainant is 72 years old and has no valid driving licence at the time of accident, what is my accused liability in a criminal case? I have all documents...

How to file anticipatory bail in Uttar Pradesh

How to file anticipatory bail in Uttar Pradesh? Now you can file anticipatory bail under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The state government by its notification dated 6 June 2019 has resumed the provision of section 438 crpc. Move an application before the court of sessions for anticipatory bail the High Court of Allahabad held in Harendra vs the state of U.P. that accused cannot move anticipatory bail application directly before the High Court.

Can a person file complaint if FIR on the same offence has been quashed?

One of the Individuals filed a private complaint against me. Case was for change of Date of Grampanchayat assessment copy of house property from 2013 to 14. Same assessment was presented in the court by us for filing a suit against him for easmentry right. Court...

Harassment from neighbour by illegal construction

The development authority has vast power to stop illegal construction. If someone doing construction in violation of sanctioned plan the development authority has the power to demolish it by using force. You can also invoke section 145 crpc for preventing the breach of peace.

quick Advice

Get A Quick Advice

Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes

Talk to Advocate Shivendra

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes and get solid advice on the phone

Book it Now