Presumption of paternity of child

Question asked on: 17/11/2014

How to presume paternity of child? Is there any law regarding the presumption of paternity of child in devoid of any direct evidence?

Advised by: Shivendra Pratap Singh,

The basic principle of law, which is laid down in sec section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, that if a person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage  between his mother and any man or within two hundred  and eighty days after its dissolution and  the  mother remains unmarried,  it shall be taken as  conclusive  proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can  be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other  at  any time when he could have been  begotten.

Sec 112. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy.—The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten.

The rule, contained in the above Section, that continuance of a valid marriage will prevent an inference being drawn to the effect that the children born to a woman during the continuance of the valid marriage were born to another person as a result of adulterous intercourse is only a rule of evidence.

Presumption of paternity

The presumption which Section 112, Evidence Act, 1872, contemplates, is a conclusive presumption of law regarding paternity which can be displaced only by proof of the particular fact mentioned in the Section, namely, non-access between the parties to the marriage at a time when according to the ordinary course of nature, the husband could have been the father of the child.

It is the principle of law about presumption of paternity that “Odiosa et inkonesta non sunt in lege prae sumenda” (Nothing odious or dishonourable will be presumed by the law). So the law presumes against vice and immorality.

Case law

In Goutam Kundu vs. State of West Bengal and another, Supreme Court held about paternity test ( DNA test)

  • That Courts in India cannot order blood test as a matter of course.
  • Wherever applications are made for such prayers in order to have roving inquiry, the prayer for blood test cannot be entertained.
  • There must be a strong prima facie case in that the husband must establish non-access in order to dispel the presumption arising under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.
  • The Court must carefully examine as to what would be the consequence of ordering the blood test, whether it will have the effect of branding a child as a bastard and the mother as an unchaste woman.
  • No one can be compelled to give samle of blood for analysis.

We may remember that Section 112 of the Evidence Act was enacted at a time when the modern scientific advancements with Dioxy Nucleric Acid (DNA) as well as Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) tests were not even in contemplation of the legislature.

The result of a genuine DNA test is said to be scientifically accurate. But even that is not enough to escape from the conclusiveness of Section 112 of the Act, e.g., if a husband and wife were living together during the time of conception but the DNA test revealed that the child was not born to the husband, the conclusiveness in law would remain unrebuttable.

Sham Lal @ Kuldeep vs. Sanjeev Kumar and others, (2009) :- Once the validity of marriage is proved then there is strong presumption about the legitimacy of children born from that wedlock. The presumption of paternity can only be rebutted by a strong, clear, satisfying and conclusive evidence.

Bhabani Prasad Jena vs. Convenor Secretary, Orissa State Commission for Women and another, (2010) Supreme court expressed his view on DNA test that ” In a matter where presumption of paternity of a child is in issue before the court, the use of DNA test is an extremely delicate and sensitive aspect. One view is that when modern science gives the means of ascertaining the paternity of a child, there should not be any hesitation to use those means whenever the occasion requires. The other view is that the court must be reluctant in the use of such scientific advances and tools which result in invasion of right to privacy of an individual and may not only be prejudicial to the rights of the parties but may have devastating effect on the child. Sometimes the result of such scientific test may bastardise an innocent child even though his mother and her spouse were living together during the time of conception.”

Conclusion

It was permissible for a Court to permit the holding of a DNA test, if it was eminently needed, after balancing the interests of the parties. Section 112 of the Evidence Act does not create a legal fiction but provides for presumption and this presumption is in favour of paternity. But court may order to conduct DNA test to determine the veracity of the allegations, which constitute one of the grounds, on which the concerned party would either succeed or lose.

Send your question

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate, Lucknow

Advice: 16865

Consultation: 3329

Can I file a case against my boyfriend who promised me to marry and then lied to me by giving family reasons?

Can I file a case against my bf who promised me to marry and then lied to me by giving family reasons and made conversation or situation along with me in such a way that I attempted to do suicide? Even while fighting on a topic we had some conflict and it tends to...

Accused husband collecting false evidence in murder case

मेरे बहन का पति झूठे साक्ष्य एकत्र कर रहा है जिससे की वो अपने आप को हत्या के मुक़दमे में बचा सके। उसने दिनाँक १८ मार्च २०१४ को अपने पत्नी की हत्या कर दी। उसका अपने मित्र की पत्नी से अबैध सम्बन्ध था। वो उसपर काफी पैसा लूटता था। उसको अपने घर में भी रखता था। उसका दोस्त...

Friend filed criminal case of cheating : What I should do?

Question: I am doing a business of terrace farming. My friend is a partner in my business. He does not help me but comes on each week to take his share in profit. Yesterday he filed a false criminal case of cheating in XXX police station. He has alleged in the FIR...

Claim juvenile at any stage

Could a juvenile accused claim his juvenility at any stage of proceeding? A fact that accused was juvenile at the time of the commission of the offence is the most important fact. This fact can be raised at any stage of a criminal proceeding. Trial, appeal and...

recall of witness in cheque bounce case

सर,मेरा नाम लख्मीचंद है मुझ पर १३८ का एक मामला दर्ज है जिसमे मामला दायर करने वाले का बयान हो चूका है मेने दूसरा वकील कर लिया है ..वकील मामला दर्ज कराने वाले का दोबारा बयान करवाना चाहता है, परन्तु अपील ख़ारिज होती नजर आ रही है यदि दोबारा बयान होता है तो मुझे न्याय मिल...

How to quash the false rape and dowry case filed by ex-girlfriend?

Can the court quash the false rape and dowry case filed by an ex-girlfriend? I knew a girl in the past 9-10 years. I genuinely wanted to marry her. When I got a good job, I sent my appointment letter to her. Her parents came to my home and we continued with the...

Should I divorce my husband on my boyfriend’s instigation?

My boyfriend instigates me to divorce my husband. Therefore, I left my husband’s house at the instigation of my boyfriend. He told me to leave the house of the husband and remarry with him. Thereafter, I willingly left the husband’s house with the self-declaration at...

The police officer has refused to register my case

Police says, No fir can be the lodge for vehicle damage caused by any person. Yesterday at 11 pm, a boy from my colony came to me and asked for my car, but I refused to give him. Then he threatened me to break and damage my car, and he has damaged the door of my car....

Can magistrate direct investigation under section 156(3) after taking cognisance

Can an order be passed to register FIR under section 156 if the case was filed under CRPC 200? I filed a complaint under section 200 of the code after my procedure but later on and another victim moved an application under section 156(3) CrPC for the direction of the...

No second FIR in same offence

No second FIR in the same offence, same incident or same occurrence. The code of criminal procedure does not allow to register more than one FIR in respect of same offence. If accused has committed more than one offences in the same transaction still there should be...

quick Advice

Get A Quick Advice

Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes

Talk to Advocate Shivendra

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes and get solid advice on the phone

Book it Now