Supreme Court
![Union of India & Ors. v. Virpal Singh Chauhan & Ors. [(1995) 6 SCC 684]](https://www.kanoonirai.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/suupreme-court-400x250.jpg)
Union of India & Ors. v. Virpal Singh Chauhan & Ors. [(1995) 6 SCC 684]
Union of India & Ors. v. Virpal Singh Chauhan & Ors. [(1995) 6 SCC 684] [C.A. Nos.9272-73 & 9277 1995 (Arising Out Of S.L.P. (C) Nos.6468 Of 1987, 1682/88, And 8111/94), C.A. No.2261/87, 5044/89, 4436/90, 18/90, W.P. (C) 1208/87 And 565/93.] Judgment 1....
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale AIR 1960 SC 137
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale AIR 1960 SC 137 [Civil Appeal No. 189 of 1955 Decided on 25/09/1959] Judgment 1. OnAugust 22, 1949, the respondent made an application in the Revenue Court of the Mamlatdar of Sirsi, District Kanara,...
Chairman and Managing Director, Central Bank of India and others v. Central Bank of India SC/ST Employees Welfare Association and others, reported in (2015) 12 SCC 308
Chairman and Managing Director, Central Bank of India and others v. Central Bank of India SC/ST Employees Welfare Association and others, reported in (2015) 12 SCC 308 Judgment By our judgment dated January 09, 2015, we had decided batch of appeals which were...
Dr. Gulshan Prakash & Ors. Versus State Of Haryana & Ors. (2010) 1 SCC 477
Dr. Gulshan Prakash & Ors. Versus State Of Haryana & Ors. (2010) 1 SCC 477; Judgment 1) The petitioners in S.L.P.(C) No. 4590 of 2008 and Writ Petition (C) No. 69 of 2009 are one and the same. Leave granted in the special leave petition. 2) Challenge in this...
Jarnail Singh & Ors. Vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta & Ors. [2022]
Jarnail Singh & Ors. Vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 629 of 2022 arising out of SLP (C) No. 30621 of 2011] Judgment 1. Leave granted (except Diary No.38895/2017). 2. Reservation of 27 per cent in favour of backward classes was the subject...
State of Punjab Vs. Anshika Goyal and Others
State of Punjab Vs. Anshika Goyal and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 317 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 318 of 2022] [Civil Appeal Nos. 319-320 of 2022] Judgment 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 26.07.2019 and 08.08.2019...
High Court of Allahabad
![A.K. Dubey And Another Versus Exide Industries Ltd. And 3 Others [2022]](https://www.kanoonirai.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/www.kanoonirai.com_-400x250.jpg)
A.K. Dubey And Another Versus Exide Industries Ltd. And 3 Others [2022]
A.K. Dubey And Another Versus Exide Industries Ltd. And 3 Others [S.C.C. REVISION No. - 36 of 2020] Judgment 1. Heard Sri A.P.Tewari, learned counsel for the revisionists. No one has appeared for the opposite parties however, a written argument was filed by Sri Manu...
Khalid Versus State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Home Civil Secy. [2022]
Khalid Versus State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Home Civil Secy. [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 376 of 2022] Judgment Heard Shri Lal Bahadur Khan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ravish Kumar Mishra, the learned A.G.A. and perused the...
Bheem Singh Versus State Of U.P Through Secretary Home, Govt. U.P. Lucknow [2022]
Bheem Singh Versus State Of U.P Through Secretary Home, Govt. U.P. Lucknow [APPLICATION U/S 482 No.- 22902 of 2021] Judgment 1. The instant application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short "the Code") has been filed to quash the impugned order...
Bhupinder Singh And Others Versus State of U.P. and Another [2022]
If the allegations set out in the complaint do not constitute the offence of which cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate, it is open to the High Court to quash the same in exercise of the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code. Bhupinder Singh And Others...
Sandeep Yadav Versus Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench At Lucknow And 6 Others [2022
We do not find any good reason to by-pass the statutory alternative remedy provided under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner leaving it open for the petitioner...
Santosh Kumar Khare Versus State Of U.P.Through Secy. [2022]
Habitual absenteeism amounts to gross violation of discipline and dismissal of such an employee from service should not be treated to be harsh. Santosh Kumar Khare Versus State Of U.P.Through Secy. [WRIT - A No. - 3365 of 2001] Judgment 1. The petitioner had filed the...