Interlocutory applications

Shivendra Pratap Singh


High Court Lucknow


Reading Time:

In the Indian legal system, the resolution of a case often involves multiple stages and procedures. One crucial aspect of this process is the use of interlocutory applications, which play a significant role in shaping the course of litigation. Interlocutory applications are legal tools that parties can use during the pendency of a case to seek interim relief, clarification, or to address specific procedural matters.

In this blog post, we will explore the concept of interlocutory applications in India, their purpose, common types, and their impact on the overall judicial process.

Purpose of Interlocutory Applications

Interlocutory applications serve several essential functions within the framework of civil litigation in India:

a. Seeking Interim Relief: One of the primary purposes of an interlocutory application is to request temporary relief or protection during the pendency of a case. This may include an injunction to restrain a party from taking certain actions or securing properties/assets pending the final judgment.

b. Clarification or Amendment: Parties can file interlocutory applications seeking clarification on specific orders passed by the court or seeking permission to amend pleadings or add parties to the suit.

c. Urgent Matters: In urgent matters, parties can file an interlocutory application for an expedited hearing or for an urgent decision on specific issues.

d. Producing Additional Evidence: If a party discovers new evidence relevant to the case after the trial has commenced, they can seek permission to produce this evidence through an interlocutory application.

Common Types of Interlocutory Applications

Several types of interlocutory applications are commonly filed in Indian courts:

a. Interim Injunction: A party can seek an interim injunction to prevent the other party from doing certain acts that may cause harm during the pendency of the case.

b. Temporary Stay: Parties can file an application for a temporary stay on any proceedings or orders passed by lower courts while the higher court reviews the matter.

c. Amendment of Pleadings: If a party wishes to amend their pleadings to include additional facts or claims, they must file an interlocutory application seeking permission from the court.

d. Production of Additional Documents: Parties can file an application to produce additional documents or evidence that was not available during the initial stages of the case.

e. Appointment of Receiver: An application may be made for the appointment of a receiver to manage or protect property/assets that are the subject matter of the dispute.

Impact on the Judicial Process

While interlocutory applications serve essential purposes, they also have an impact on the judicial process:

a. Delays: Frequent filing of interlocutory applications can lead to delays in the main proceedings, particularly if the court has to hear multiple applications before addressing the core issues of the case.

b. Case Management Challenges: The large volume of interlocutory applications can pose challenges for case management, especially in courts with a heavy workload.

c. Balancing Interests: Courts must carefully balance the rights and interests of both parties while deciding on interlocutory applications to ensure that justice is served.

Best Practices and Recommendations

To improve the efficiency of the legal system and avoid potential abuse of interlocutory applications, the following best practices can be considered:

a. Strict Case Management: Courts can adopt robust case management techniques to control the number of interlocutory applications and minimize delays.

b. Cost Consequences: Implementing cost consequences for frivolous or unnecessary interlocutory applications may deter parties from filing such applications.

c. Use of Technology: Leveraging technology for case management and e-filing of interlocutory applications can streamline the process and reduce paperwork.


Interlocutory applications are an integral part of the Indian legal system, enabling parties to seek interim relief and address specific procedural matters during the course of a case. While they play a crucial role in securing the rights of litigants, their frequent and sometimes frivolous use can lead to delays and challenges in the judicial process.

Striking the right balance between granting interim relief and ensuring expeditious resolution is essential to uphold the principles of justice in India’s evolving legal landscape. By implementing best practices and leveraging technology, the courts can manage interlocutory applications effectively and maintain the integrity of the judicial system.