Paid Advise

How to set aside ex parte decree passed in civil suit

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate (Lucknow)

Online advising since Oct. 2014

Civil Law

Reading Time:

I purchased a plot in Saharanpur for the consideration of thirty-five lakh. The younger brother of the seller has filed a lawsuit for cancellation of the sale deed. I did not present in the court proceeding on some dates because I live in Mumbai. The civil court has passed an ex-parte order. I came to know about it from other sources. What is the remedy available against this decree?

It was your responsibility to present before the court. If you could not be able to appear on some dates, you were to move an adjournment application. The court does not pass an ex-parte decree without giving ample opportunity to the opposite party to present in the court proceeding. When the court finds that the defendant is deliberately remaining absent, the court is bound to pass an ex-parte decree in favour of the plaintiff.

Move an application for setting aside the decree

At this stage, you have a right to set aside that decree if you had sufficient cause to remain absent in the court. You should immediately move an interlocutory application (IA) for setting aside/restoration of the ex-parte decree.

When the defendant had sufficient reason for non-appearance before the court, he can move an IA under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) for setting aside the ex-parte decree.

You said that you are living in Mumbai. In this condition, it might be possible that the plaintiff got the decree by placing false evidence before the court. If he obtained the decree by any fraudulent act, then you may also move an application before the court under section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Adducing false evidence is an offence punishable under section 193-199 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

If you don’t want to set aside the ex-parte decree, you can file an appeal under section 96 of the CPC.

Prefer an appeal against the ex-parte decree

In Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar [(2005) 1 SCC 787]; the Supreme Court observed that when an ex-parte decree passed, the defendant has two clear options. First, to file an appeal or to submit an application for setting aside the order regarding Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code. He can initiate both proceedings simultaneously.

Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC, empowers the Court to set aside the ex-parte decree when the applicant shows “sufficient cause” for his absence.

It is mandatory for you to prove that there was sufficient reason for your non-appearance. In State of Rajasthan v. Shankar Lal, (2009) 16 SCC 116 the Supreme Court is held that the reasons given for restoration of the petition should be satisfactory in considering the facts of the case. If there is no sufficient cause was shown for the restoration of the petition, then it should be dismissed.

The petition must show the cogent reason for absence because the court may examine the facts stated therein. Its contents are vital for determination of sufficient cause. If the court finds that there was adequate reason for absence, then it shall set aside the ex-parte decree.

In Raj Kishore Pandey v. the State of U.P., [(2009) 2 SCC 692] the Supreme Court is held that whether the applicant has made out sufficient cause or not in the application for restoration, the court is required to look at all facts pleaded in the petition.

You have two options against the ex-parte decree. Either you may move a petition for setting aside the decree or file an appeal against that decree.

0 Comments

shivendra pratap singh advocate

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate (Lucknow)

You can consult on Criminal, Civil, Matrimonial, Writ, Service matters, Property, Revenue and RERA related issues.

More For you

Can mental illness put a bar on holding sensitive posts?

Question: Can a patient of mental illness who is on regular medication become a member and chairman of child welfare, women welfare, juvenile justice board and handle such sensitive matters? Can mental illness put a bar on holding sensitive posts?  Asked from:...

Encroachment of the public paved road

Question: There is an encroachment of the public paved road. Can anyone occupy a 60-year-old paved public road by saying that this has been made wrong? What is the legality of the road in Indian law?  Asked from: Uttar Pradesh Public road is a public property...

How to get back money from my younger brother?

Question: How to get back money from my younger brother?. Younger brother demanded money from the older brother and gave some amount to him without any  paperwork. If the younger brother ignores or does not return the money, what action will the older brother take ?...

Section 38 of Specific Relief Act 1963

Section 38 Specific Relief Act Perpetual injunctions when granted (1) Subject to the other provisions contained in or referred to by this Chapter a perpetual injunction may be granted to the plaintiff to prevent the breach of an obligation existing in his favour,...

Case filed based on False Sale Agreement 

Question: I am 74 yrs old so don't want the case to drag on for obvious reasons. Hence this query. Never had a brush with court in these 74 years but NOW I have been made respondent in a case against me based on a clearly Forged document.  Bought 1 acr land in...

Kanoonirai has been advising in legal issues since October 2014. You can consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54