Home | Legal Advice | Civil Law | Election Commission is holding byelection instead of declaring runner up candidate as winner

Election Commission is holding byelection instead of declaring runner up candidate as winner

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

High Court Lucknow

Civil Law

Reading Time:

Advised on 18 Jul, 2021

Question: I am the runner up candidate in the gram pradhan election. The election commission has reserved our seat for the scheduled caste candidate. In the final result XXX has won the election. Later on he found other backward caste (OBC) candidate. Therefore, the district election commissioner has rejected his candidature. Now the Election Commission is holding a byelection instead of declaring the runner up candidate as winner.  

That person is very influential in politics hence somehow he has managed to hold byelection. He doesn’t want me to hold the seat of gram pradhan. Therefore, he is planning to hold the byelection. This is illegal and the District Magistrate is also taking this favour. In this scenario it seems very difficult to stop the byelection.. 

Question from: Uttar Pradesh

The circumstances of your case suggest that holding a byelection is illegal. This seat is reserved for the person of scheduled caste. Other backward candidates cannot contest from this seat. The district election commissioner has cancelled the candidature of the winning candidate only after the completion of election. 

I think that the district election commissioner would have issued the certificate in his favour. Hence, the entire election procedure has been completed without any illegality. His caste certificate shows that he is an OBC candidate, this evidence is sufficient to cancel his election. He has no ground to challenge the election procedure. Therefore, the election commission should declare the runner up candidate as the winner from this seat. The election commission cannot hold byelection in this scenario [Pramod Laxman Gudadhe vs Election Commission of India AIR 2018 SC 2356]

File a writ petition under Article 226

In this situation you move a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court may issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the election commission to declare the runner up as the winner. 

Because there is no procedural defect in holding the entire election. No candidate has any grievance towards the manner of holding the election of gram pradhan. It proves that the election is fair and conducted in accordance with the law. These facts will stop the election commission to hold byelection [D. Sanjeevayya Vs. The Election Tribunal of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1967 SC 1211]

Your claim is genuine and you’ll get relief from the High Court. So you should file a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226.

Ask A Question

Election Commission is holding byelection instead of declaring runner up candidate as winner

shivendra pratap singh advocate

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate (Lucknow)

I offer legal advice and representation in various fields of law, such as Criminal, Civil, Writ, Matrimonial, Service matters, Property, Revenue and SARFAESI related cases. I have experience in handling complex and challenging cases with diligence and professionalism.

Also Read

Shared demat accounts

Question: My brother and mother held a shared demat account jointly, with my brother as the first holder and my mother as the second holder. Unfortunately, both of them passed away last year. My brother's wife and son are his successors, while...

read more

Kanoonirai has been advising in legal issues since October 2014. You can consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54