Home | Legal Advice | Civil Law Cases | Election Commission is holding byelection instead of declaring runner up candidate as winner

Election Commission is holding byelection instead of declaring runner up candidate as winner

Question: I am the runner up candidate in the gram pradhan election. The election commission has reserved our seat for the scheduled caste candidate. In the final result XXX has won the election. Later on he found other backward caste (OBC) candidate. Therefore, the district election commissioner has rejected his candidature. Now the Election Commission is holding a byelection instead of declaring the runner up candidate as winner. That person is very influential in politics hence somehow he has managed to hold byelection. He doesn’t want me to hold the seat of gram pradhan. Therefore, he is planning to hold the byelection. This is illegal and the District Magistrate is also taking this favour. In this scenario it seems very difficult to stop the byelection.
Question in: Civil Law Cases
advocate shivendra

Advocate Shivendra

Advocate

High Court Lucknow

Reading Time:

The circumstances of your case suggest that holding a byelection is illegal. This seat is reserved for the person of scheduled caste. Other backward candidates cannot contest from this seat. The district election commissioner has cancelled the candidature of the winning candidate only after the completion of election. 

I think that the district election commissioner would have issued the certificate in his favour. Hence, the entire election procedure has been completed without any illegality. His caste certificate shows that he is an OBC candidate, this evidence is sufficient to cancel his election. He has no ground to challenge the election procedure. Therefore, the election commission should declare the runner up candidate as the winner from this seat. The election commission cannot hold byelection in this scenario [Pramod Laxman Gudadhe vs Election Commission of India AIR 2018 SC 2356]

File a writ petition under Article 226

In this situation you move a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court may issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the election commission to declare the runner up as the winner. 

Because there is no procedural defect in holding the entire election. No candidate has any grievance towards the manner of holding the election of gram pradhan. It proves that the election is fair and conducted in accordance with the law. These facts will stop the election commission to hold byelection [D. Sanjeevayya Vs. The Election Tribunal of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1967 SC 1211]

Your claim is genuine and you’ll get relief from the High Court. So you should file a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226.

Recent Advise

I constructed my house on the written permission of NHAI : How to protect its demolition?

As per Karnataka state government laws building to be constructed 40 metre away from the centre line of national highway’s road. When we approached the NHAI, engineer provided conditional approval about building construction. He took written statements saying that the owner will not receive compensation for demolition of his building if the NHAI would demolish his building during road widening. We started building construction after getting approval from NHAI. Now the Karnataka high court bench has upheld the government’s law about 40 metre. The court has directed the authority to take action. Could you please guide how we can proceed now.

An agreement to sale holder has dispossessed me forcefully

I bought the immovable property through a registered sale deed. Before purchasing the immovable property the seller made an unregistered sale agreement with another one and gave him the possession of the property. But later on the person who made a sale agreement did not act as per sale agreement. So the original owner of the property sent him a notice for cancellation of the sale agreement. After that I purchased the said property through the registered sale deed and I took possession of the said property. Now that unregistered sale agreement holder files a suit under specific performance and forcefully took the possession of said property. Now matter is pending in court so my question is whether I can lodge the FIR against the unregistered sale agreement person for trespass offence?

Kanoonirai established in 2014. It provides a facility to consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54