Paid Advise

Dishonour of security cheque is no offence under N I Act

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate (Lucknow)

Online advising since Oct. 2014

33507 Advices

41371 Consultations

Reading Time:

I gave a loan to my friend because he was facing some financial hardship. At the same time, he gave me a security cheque. That security cheque was bearing the equal amount of loan because he intended to secure the loan. However, I was quite sure that he will repay the loan within 2 months but unfortunately, he failed to do so. 

Thereafter, I made some query regarding the repayment of the loan. He told me to encash the security cheque and after receiving his assurance, I presented that cheque in the bank. The bank informed me that he has dishonoured the cheque.

I sent him a demand notice to pay the loan amount but he did not reply. After receiving no response from him, I have filed a complaint against him. At the trial, he pleaded that it was a security cheque, therefore, he stopped that cheque. He said that no offence is made out under section 138 NI act. Is he right? What the law towards security cheque?

Question from: Karnataka

You friend had dishonoured the cheque by stopping the payment. Such an act proves that he:

  • Knew about the presentment of that cheque
  • Instructed the bank to stop the payment
  • Intentionally dishonoured the cheque
  • He does not want to discharge his liability

Security cheque

When a person issues the cheque as collateral security then the said cheque is called a security cheque. Collateral security means an asset which a borrower gives to the lender to sell it upon failure of repayment of the loan. 

The cheque is used as collateral security in the commercial transaction. That cheque does not subject to encashment because it is not issued in discharge of debt or liability. 

You friend took a loan from you and issued a cheque. He cannot say afterwards that it is a security cheque because he was in debt at the time of issue of that cheque. Therefore, he issued the cheque in discharge of debt. 

Prima facie it is not a security cheque. According to Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the presumption of discharge of debt or liability lies in your favour. The law presumes that you received the cheque in discharge of debt. Now the burden of proof shifted upon your friend to prove it a security cheque. 

Dishonour of security cheque is no offence

Dishonour of security cheque is no offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (NI Act). The security cheque does not represent any debt or financial liability. Therefore, its dishonour is no offence under the NI Act.

In Sudheer Kumar Bhalla vs Jagdish Chandra Bhalla and others 2009, SCC; the Supreme Court held that criminal liability under the provision of section 138 NI Act does attract only on account of dishonour of cheque issued in discharge of liability or debt but not on account of issuance of security cheque.

Goa HRSSI Development Crp. Vs Samudra Ropes (P) Ltd (2006) 1 ICC Bombay: Dishonour of security cheque does not entail the penal liability.

Absence of debt or liability at the time of issue of cheque, therefore, renders the cheque a security cheque. The holder of that cheque has no right to present it for the encashment. Hence, no criminal liability arises on its dishonour.

Dishonour of cheque is an offence

Dishonour of cheque is an offence when the drawer has issued in the discharge of debt or liability. Your friend cannot deny that he was indebted at the time of issue of that cheque. He wanted to discharge his debt therefore he issued that cheque. 

The presumption of debt also lies in your favour. He has to rebut that presumption by adducing evidence that it was a security cheque. In current circumstances, he cannot rebut that presumption because he could not deny the loan. 

In P. Venugopal vs Madan P. Sarathi, (2009) 1 SCC; the Supreme Court held that if the cheque is issued partly in the discharge of liability or debt, then it does not call a security cheque. Its dishonour shall constitute an offence under section 138 of the NI Act.

You have enough evidence to prove that he has dishonoured the cheque

All the ingredients of section 138 NI Act are present in your case. You can successfully prove your case on these grounds:

  • Accused took a loan from you.
  • He issued the cheque in discharge of that debt.
  • Debt existed at the time of issue of the cheque.
  • He intentionally stopped the payment of the cheque.
  • You received no response from accused against the demand notice.
  • Accused did not deny the averment of demand notice.

All the above-said grounds are sustainable and the accused cannot deny it in the trial. He has no evidence to prove that alleged cheque is a security cheque. Therefore, his plea of security cheque is false and frivolous.

shivendra pratap singh advocate

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate (Lucknow)

You can consult on Criminal, Civil, Matrimonial, Writ, Service matters, Property, Revenue and RERA related issues.

More For you

Threatening woman on revealing the truth to family 

Question: A man is threatening a woman on revealing the truth to her family. I'm a husband. I'm writing this for my wife. She had an affair with a person and she also helped him with money in his difficult time without informing me. Few days back she apologised...

In 498A, will my family get arrested?

Question: In 498A, will my family get arrested? My wife has filed a false case against my family. She wanted to marry her friend but due to pressure from her father she married me. There is no fault from my side but due to the whim of my wife my family is facing...

Can I file a complaint against the family court?

Question: Can I file a complaint against the family court? Asked from: Kerala You can file a complaint against the sitting subordinate court judge for his misconduct or dishonest conduct in dealing lawsuits. But you must have credible and clinching evidence to prove...

Section 383 Indian Penal Code: Extortion

Section 383: Extortion Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security or anything signed or sealed which...

My sister is being mental harassed by her ex-boyfriend 

Question: My sister was in a relationship for 7 yrs and after that she decided to part ways with boyfriend due to some issues. My sister is being mental harassed by her ex-boyfriend. She was informed this in 2020 and after that asked him not to contact him. He visited...

My boyfriend has exploited me by spending money on me

Question: My boyfriend and I had a relationship for 6 yrs. My boyfriend has exploited me by spending money on me and I spent too little as I was a student. We were both happy because he spent a lot of money on me and bore my study expenses.  But now I am unhappy with...

Kanoonirai has been advising in legal issues since October 2014. You can consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54