Home | Legal Advice | Criminal Law | Contradiction in dying declaration : chances of conviction

Contradiction in dying declaration : chances of conviction

Question: My brother is accused in a murder case. He is innocent but the police have falsely implicated him in this case. The dying declaration of the deceased does not support his role in the murder of Ramnaresh Kushwaha. There is a contradiction in the dying declaration so I want to know what is the chance of conviction of my brother?
Question in: Criminal Law
advocate shivendra

Shivendra Singh


High Court Lucknow

Reading Time:

Dying declaration is an important piece of evidence under Section 32(2) of the Indian Evidence Act. The court can convict the accused on the sole evidence of dying declaration if it seems true. It is the duty of the prosecution to prove the dying declaration of the deceased. 

You said that there are contradictions in the dying declaration. If there are more dying declarations than one then it may have some contradions and the court will check the veracity of dying declarations. In case there is only one dying declaration then contradion is not possible. 

In the first sceneration the court may discard the dying declaration if the contradictions are major and significant. The court will reject the dying declaration and cannot convict the accused on such a dying declaration. Thus, the conviction will base upon the proof of other criminating evidence.  

In case of minor contradictions the court will not reject the dying declaration. Because, the witness has the tendency to refine his statement. 

Contradiction between dying declaration and other evidence

A dying declaration becomes contradictory if it does not get corroboration from the other independent evidence like post mortem report, evidence of eye witness etc. In this situation the court will not rely on the dying declaration but appreciate other evidence. 

This is not a rule that the court will acquit the accused on the suspicious dying declaration. Whereas, the court will convict the accused if the prosecution has successfully proved the culpability of the accused. The prosecution can prove the guilt of your brother by other evidence. So, I can’t say that the court will acquit your brother because the dying declaration remains disproved. There is a good chance that the court will convict the accused on the evidence other than dying declaration. 

Recent Advise

I constructed my house on the written permission of NHAI : How to protect its demolition?

As per Karnataka state government laws building to be constructed 40 metre away from the centre line of national highway’s road. When we approached the NHAI, engineer provided conditional approval about building construction. He took written statements saying that the owner will not receive compensation for demolition of his building if the NHAI would demolish his building during road widening. We started building construction after getting approval from NHAI. Now the Karnataka high court bench has upheld the government’s law about 40 metre. The court has directed the authority to take action. Could you please guide how we can proceed now.

An agreement to sale holder has dispossessed me forcefully

I bought the immovable property through a registered sale deed. Before purchasing the immovable property the seller made an unregistered sale agreement with another one and gave him the possession of the property. But later on the person who made a sale agreement did not act as per sale agreement. So the original owner of the property sent him a notice for cancellation of the sale agreement. After that I purchased the said property through the registered sale deed and I took possession of the said property. Now that unregistered sale agreement holder files a suit under specific performance and forcefully took the possession of said property. Now matter is pending in court so my question is whether I can lodge the FIR against the unregistered sale agreement person for trespass offence?

Kanoonirai established in 2014. It provides a facility to consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.