By: Team Kanoonirai
Advice in Civil Law Cases

Reading Progress:

Cancellation of contract

by | 19 Nov, 2015 | Civil Law Cases

Home | Advice | Civil Law Cases | Cancellation of contract

My company had signed a contract with another company for digging the land for construction of railway lines and rail bridges. At the time of the contract, all the terms and conditions were finalised by the other company. Other company published a tender for the construction work.

My company was the only one company selected for that work through tender. It is mandatory for the company to take the permission of the forest department which was refused by the said department.

So I want cancellation of the contract on the ground that when permission is rejected by the government so work cannot be initiated but the other company file a suit for breach of contract and compensation for the cancellation of the contract. What should I do?

According to your case, you have the right to cancel this agreement because the performance of the contract is based upon permission of the forest department for initiation of work. However, tender is issued and completed according to the law but at that time it might be presumed that the forest department may give permission so no saving clause was included in the contract.

This contract is frustrated because not getting permission from the forest department. Section 56 of the Indian Contract provides a right to cancellation of the contract on the ground of frustration. Frustration is an act outside the contract due to which the completion of a contract becomes impossible.

After the parties have concluded a contract, events beyond their control may occur which frustrate the purpose of their agreement or render it very difficult or impossible, or as even illegal, to perform. You should take a plea of frustration because permission from the forest department is an event which is out of your control. And permission was a sine qua non for the performance of the contract.

In Nirmala Anand vs. Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd AIR 2002 SC: it is held by the supreme court that the competent authority has been moved and application for consent or sanction have been rejected once and for all and such rejection renders impossible the performance of the contract due to frustration under section 56 contract act. The relief must be given to the party and keep them in the same position as they were before the contract.

When a contract becomes impossible to perform due to its frustration then it cannot be enforced by the court. You shall not be liable to pay any compensation.

Other advice you might like

Recitation of azaan may be an integral part of Islam

The right to recite Azan though sound-amplifying devices are not protected under Article 25 since it is not an integral part of Islam. The microphone is a gift of technological age; its adverse effect is well felt all over the world. Use of loudspeakers otherwise in accordance with law affects fundamental rights of the citizens under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

Section 34: Specific Relief Act 1963

Section 34: Discretion of court as to declaration of status or right Any person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit against any person denying or interested to deny, his title to such character or right, and the...

Office

Spring Greens Apartment
Ayodhya Road
Lucknow

Contact

mail[at]kanoonirai.com
+91-91400-4[nine][six]54