Home | Legal Advice | Case Law | A. Kanthamani v. Nasreen Ahmed 2017

A. Kanthamani v. Nasreen Ahmed 2017

By Shivendra Pratap Singh
Estimated Reading Time:

Readiness and willingness has been the subject-matter of interpretation. The crux of the Supreme Court’s judgment has been given below.

A. Kanthamani v. Nasreen Ahmed

The expression “readiness and willingness” has been the subject-matter of interpretation in many cases even prior to its insertion in Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. While examining the question as to how and in what manner, the plaintiff is required to prove his financial readiness so as to enable him to claim specific performance of the contract/agreement.

A. Kanthamani v. Nasreen Ahmed (2017) 4 SCC 654

Privacy Protection

Under privacy protection, we don’t publish your questions on the website. We keep your question confidential and protected by password.

shivendra pratap singh advocate

Shivendra Pratap Singh


Practising lawyer at the High Court Lucknow. Expertise in Criminal, Civil, Matrimonial, Writ, Service matters, Property, Revenue and RERA related issues.

Kanoonirai has been advising in legal issues since October 2014. You can consult a lawyer through online media, telephonic consultation and video conferencing.